Bayer suffers a legal setback in the USA, the action loses more than 6%

Bayer suffered a legal setback in the United States on glyphosate, the general counsel at the Supreme Court having given an unfavorable opinion in a lawsuit against the agrochismiste, with the effect of a sharp decline in the title on Wednesday.

The title ended the session in Frankfurt down 6.22% to 58.04 euros in a Dax gaining 2.17%, investors being cooled by a decision of the Court following this opinion which could open the way to billions euros in claims for damages. The case in question dates back to May 2021, when a San Francisco appeals court upheld an order against Bayer to pay $25 million in damages to retiree Edwin Hardeman, who was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2015. He accuses the herbicide Roundup of having caused his cancer and Monsanto, acquired by Bayer in 2018, of failing to warn customers on the product’s label. Bayer then filed an appeal with the United States Supreme Court. But in her opinion submitted to America’s highest court on Tuesday, Attorney General Elizabeth Prelogar, who represents the government, says that “the appeal must be dismissed“.

A reexamination of the arguments of the Trump administration

His opinion marks a change in the administration’s tone from the Trump presidency, when the Justice Department sided with Bayer at the time of the call. “The United States reconsidered the arguments given the Court’s decision and the change in administration“explains the Advocate General. In a statement, Bayer said, “still convinced that there are good legal arguments for the Court to consider the caseby Edwin Hardeman andcorrect the verdict“. “Regardless of the Decision, We Are Prepared to End Roundup Litigation“Notes Bayer, which set aside $4.5 billion in July 2021 in the event of an unfavorable decision.

The group disputes the verdict of the court of appeals in particular because it is based on the law of the Californian state where the federal agency for the protection of the environment (EPA) estimates that the use of Roundup does not deserve no special cancer warning. But this does not dispense with respecting astate-level law requiring such a warning“, believes for his part the Advocate General. The main active ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, classified asprobable carcinogenby the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) – a characterization the German group disputes.

.

Leave a Comment