For more than a century, human activities have caused the. The extinction of some of them is directly caused by the interest they have generated for humans. This is for example the case of the three species of present on the islands of the Indian Ocean and the last of which disappeared in 1790, in particular because of its overexploitation and the destruction of its habitat by Man. Other groups of animals, such as mammoths, owe their disappearance to . The fact today of concentrating on the protection of species that still exist does not prevent those that are extinct from being a source of fantasies, all the more so if they reached a large size, had a singular or were particularly terrifying.
Unlike science fiction, the science of “de-extinction” of species is more often concerned with small, less publicized and with an unsurprising morphology. The reason for this is that researchers need to use very well-known extant species that are genetically close to the extinct species of interest and are large enough to enter and handle easily in a laboratory. Experiments to “resuscitate” and mammoths are therefore not the most common…
Restore pieces of the species…but not the species
In contrast, a research team publishedabout the “de-extinction” of the Christmas Island rat (Rattus mcleari, north-west Australia) who died between 1898 and 1908, as well as about the limitations of this science in general. In this article, the authors report that there are three methods to “de-extinguish” a species: back breeding (selection in current species of characters present in the extinct species), the and the . They explain that the latter method is the most likely to work on a large number of extinct species but that it depends on the quality of the reconstruction of the of these.
There are three methods to “de-extinguish” a species: back breedingcloning and genetic engineering
The study authors re-sequenced the genome of the Christmas Island rat and overlaid it with those of current representatives of the genus Rattus in order to recover from them the missing portions of the genome of the extinct species. However, they found that almost 5% of this genome was unrecoverable despite the very good quality of the sequencescurrent species. This is due to the evolutionary divergence that has taken place between current species and R.mcleari since its extinction. In addition, more than 1,600 (among 34,200) of R.mcleari have a sequence that is less than 90% complete and 26 are completely absent.
The authors also highlight the fact that these lost sequences do not seem to concern random genes and that they greatly affect those involved in theand the . If the genome of R.mcleari or any other extinct species were to be used to recreate a current species, this one would therefore be very different from the one that has disappeared. It is in this sense that the scientist Ben Novak, who specializes in the rescue and “de-extinction”, says that it is possible to create species similar to extinct ones but that ” you can never bring back something that’s gone “.